In an earlier post, my colleague Reid Bourdet described how we migrated our largest Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Cisco UCM) cluster to a virtual machine environment running on Cisco Unified Computing System (Cisco UCS) servers. This was the 19-node (server) Cisco UCM cluster that serves the Cisco headquarters campus in San Jose, California; and we completed the migration over a weekend.
What makes that move even more interesting is that we’re nearly done consolidating 5 separate clusters into one virtual environment, and reducing the total number of servers by a factor of four. Virtualization on the Cisco UCS hardware allows us to consolidate multiple UCM nodes on a single blade. In this post, I’ll provide more details about the scope of this migration, the results we’ve gained, and how we’ll continue migrating other Cisco UCM clusters to Cisco UCS servers around the world.
UCM Clusters in the Cisco San Jose Campus
In addition to the Cisco UCM cluster supporting the San Jose campus population, our San Jose location is home to four other Cisco UCM clusters, and by the end of the current fiscal year, we will have migrated all of them from 116 Cisco MCS 7845 Media Convergence Servers to 32 Cisco UCS B200 M2 Blade Servers, split between two local data centers.
Cisco UCM Cluster |
Before San Jose |
After San Jose |
San Jose campus UCM Cluster 25,000 users 45,000 configured phones |
48 Cisco MCS 7845 Servers |
Multiple virtual machines shared across |
Western United States UCM Cluster 6500 users 15,000 configured phones |
27 Cisco MCS 7845 Servers |
|
Western United States Contact Center Cluster 2000 agents 4000 configured phones |
17 Cisco MCS 7845 Servers |
|
Global Telepresence Cluster 2000 endpoints |
5 Cisco MCS 7845 Servers |
|
WebEx Conference Cluster |
19 Cisco MCS 7845 Servers |
|
Total Number of Servers |
116 Cisco MCS 7845 Servers |
32 Cisco UCS B200 M2 |
Although migrating such vital IT systems to a new server platform requires careful planning and a large coordinated effort, the benefits make it worthwhile.
Cost and resource savings. The compact design of blade servers and the ability to host multiple systems on a single blade can have a tremendous payback in resource savings and cost reductions.
Data Center Resource |
Cisco MCS 7845 Servers |
Cisco UCS B200 M2 |
Net Savings |
Electrical Power |
39.21 kW |
7.94 kW |
80% |
Rack Unit Space |
232 RU |
24 RU |
90% |
Cabling |
348 network cables |
36 network cables |
90% |
By the end of 2012, we’ll complete projects to migrate the remainder of our production UCM clusters around the world. The larger clusters (such as in Amsterdam) which reside in data centers we migrate to Cisco UCS B-series blades because of the efficiency gained with the higher density of virtual machines supported. With B-series blades, we also use SAN storage to gain the benefits of separating storage from computing. For smaller clusters (for example in Sydney and Singapore) which reside in telecom closets or small server rooms we migrate to Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers. The rack servers are more suitable for the smaller locations because of the fewer number of required virtual machines that need to be supported.
For more information about our UC-to-UCS migrations, check out these posts:
- Migrating a Large Cisco UCM Cluster to Cisco UCS over the Weekend
- Migrating a Cisco UCM Cluster to UCS from a Small Village
CONNECT WITH CISCO
LET US HELP
Call us: 1.800.553.6387 - Ext 118
US/Can | 5am-5pm Pacific Other Countries