In reply to Mark Rayson.

Hi Mark, I've a couple of comments related to your note:
1- A drone is extremely helpful (outside the consumer space of course) even without a camera. As a matter of fact, a RGB camera is just one of the many sensors you can connect to a drone. For instance we used thermal camera, gas sensors and others to enable multiple use case such as quality of air monitor, SP antenna analysis and so on. All of them with high economical and technical advantages.
2- Swedish decision come from, afaik, the need to protect people privacy and apparently they are classifying a drone as a video surveillance solution. That means a lot of rules to comply about data protection for privacy as well. Personally I see things differently, but in any case, the solution we implemented is protecting payload data (end to end) via encryption. So, I guess it would not be impossible to add those features that can technically make a drone equivalent to a video surveillance solution. Issue, to me, is that this may definitely have a value for the enterprise sector, but would definitively not work for the consumer market.